Key Financial Metrics for Evaluating Nigerian Funds
When assessing the potential financial returns from Nigerian investments, LPs must look beyond simple headline numbers. The unique economic environment of an emerging market like Nigeria requires a more nuanced interpretation of standard performance metrics.
Understanding what these figures truly represent in the local context is essential for making an informed investment decision.
Internal Rate of Return (IRR): Looking Beyond the Headline Number
The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is a standard metric used to show the annualised return of an investment. In presentations from Nigerian GPs, you will often see high projected IRRs, which reflect the high-growth nature of the market.
However, an Australian LP must approach these projections with a healthy dose of scepticism. It is vital to scrutinise the underlying assumptions that generate these figures. How realistic are the revenue growth forecasts for the portfolio companies? At what valuation multiples are the GPs expecting to exit their investments?
High projected IRRs are only meaningful if they are based on credible, defensible assumptions. The timing of cash flows, which is central to IRR calculations, is also heavily influenced by currency fluctuations and potential delays in exits, making historical performance a more reliable guide than future projections.
Total Value to Paid-In (TVPI): Assessing the Total Return Profile
Total Value to Paid-In (TVPI) provides a holistic view of a fund’s performance by measuring its total value—both realised cash and the estimated value of remaining assets—against the capital contributed by LPs. It is calculated as the sum of Distributions to Paid-In (DPI) and the Residual Value to Paid-In (RVPI).
A TVPI of 2.0x, for example, means the fund has generated twice the value of the capital invested. When analysing a Nigerian fund, pay close attention to the composition of the TVPI.
In a fund that is several years old, a high TVPI driven primarily by unrealised value (a high RVPI) can be a warning sign. It necessitates deeper questions about the fund’s valuation methodology and the tangible prospects for exiting the remaining investments to turn that paper value into actual cash.
Distributions to Paid-In (DPI): The “Cash-on-Cash” Reality
For any LP, but especially for an Australian investor dealing with cross-border complexities, Distributions to Paid-In (DPI) is arguably the most important metric. DPI measures the actual cash returned to investors as a percentage of the capital they have contributed.
It represents the realised, tangible profit from the investment. While TVPI shows the potential, DPI shows the reality.
A fund with a high DPI demonstrates its ability to not just identify good investments but to successfully exit them and return capital to its backers.
In a market where currency devaluation can erode returns, the cash-on-cash return measured by DPI is the ultimate test of a GP’s success. It answers the simple, direct question: “How much of my money have I received back?”
Multiple on Invested Capital (MOIC): Judging Individual Deal Performance
Multiple on Invested Capital (MOIC), also known as the investment multiple, measures the performance of a single investment within the fund’s portfolio. It is calculated by dividing the total value of an investment (realised and unrealised) by the initial cost of the investment.
When conducting due diligence, an LP should ask to see the MOIC for all deals in a GP’s track record. This provides insight into the consistency of their performance.
A fund’s overall return should not be propped up by one single runaway success while all other investments failed. A strong track record is one that shows a consistent ability to generate healthy MOICs across a range of deals, demonstrating a repeatable investment and value-creation process.